Category: Articles

  • Study of a Telegraph Tuning Fork

    by Gary Johnson, NA6O gwj@me.com

    Terrestrial telegraphy required countless inventions, and one of the more unusual devices from that industry is the subject of this report. I am calling it a Telegraph Tuning Fork (TTF) because I can find no better description at this time. It came to me via a friend who got it from a fellow who collected surplus equipment, in particular from the Navy’s Mare Island facility near Vallejo, CA. Considering the history of the facility beginning in 1854 and the Navy’s extensive use of all forms of communication, this could indeed be the provenance of this item.

    Figure 1. My mystery instrument.

    Who Made It and When?

    There is a partial label on the instrument, seen in Figure 2. It was made for The Western Union Telegraph Co., so indeed it has something to do with telegraphic communications. Its manufacturer turns out to be D. & H. Precision Tool Co. in Newark, NJ. This company was founded no later than 1918 by Mr. DeSaules and Mr. Hall, and still exists today as D & H Cutoff Co. So perhaps it was made in the early 20th century. Someone skilled at identifying early electrical components may have an opinion.

    Figure 2. This label gives us a starting point.

    Searching online, the closest match to my device was located at the Smithsonian (Figure 3). They identified it as a telegraph tuning fork, and the maker is Western Union Co. It does have some of the basic features and clearly we are on the right track for identification.

    Figure 3. Photo from the Smithsonian National Museum of American History, identified as a telegraph tuning fork [Ref. 1].

    Overview of the Instrument

    Figure 4 is an annotated top view that identifies the major components. The base is of cast bronze and the entire device weighs about 35 pounds. The main structure is literally a long, heavy tuning fork fabricated from steel and anchored at the left end. A series of weights adjust the resonant frequency. A large electromagnet (MAG-1) resides under the fork, with pole pieces just outside of the arms so that when energized the arms are pulled outward. Clearly this is the excitation method. Two sets of SPDT contacts are actuated by movement of the forks. At the far right end is a pair of coils (MAG-2A and B) that apparently are used to sense motion of the forks. Four terminal strips provide connection points.

    A clever gear-driven mechanism slides tuning weights along the forks, thus allowing the resonant frequency to be adjusted while the forks are in motion. I located a patent [Ref. 2] “Adjustable-Vibration Tuning Fork” assigned to Western Union Telegraph Co. in 1923 that describes this mechanism. Due to age and corrosion, the mechanism is frozen, and no attempt was made to restore it.

    Figure 4. Top view of the TTF, annotated.

    Looking at the bottom of the device in Figure 5, a number of electrical components are identified. Three identical capacitors, C1-C3, are all marked 1 uF and in fact tested good despite their age. A stack of three resistors, R1-3, measured 150 Ohms. A pushbutton module is connected in series with MAG-1, so that may be considered the on/off switch for excitation. I didn’t have a suitable instrument for measuring inductance but did measure the resistance of each coil.

    Figure 5. Bottom view of the TTF, annotated.

    Analysis and Operation

    After identifying components and doing some wire tracing, a schematic was produced (Figure 6). Operation is simple. Starting at rest with S2 closed, an applied voltage produces a current in MAG-1, forcing the forks to move outward, which opens S2. Current collapses, allowing the forks to move inward, then the cycle repeats. This is a kind of relaxation oscillator and will preferentially operate at the resonant frequency of the mechanical system. C1 and R1 form a snubber circuit which suppresses arcing when the contacts open.

    A second set of contacts, S1, also has snubber on each side and connections are simply routed to a terminal strip TS2. These could be used to synchronize an external device with the vibration of the forks.

    Coils MAG-2A and B are connected in series and brought out to TS3. They could be used for monitoring oscillation. TS4 is routed to a pair of wires that are disconnected on this instrument. There are some mounting holes in a black bracket above MAG-2A and B that may have held a now-missing device.

    Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the TTF. (Link to PDF)

    Even after a hundred years or so, this instrument is still functional! Some cleaning of contacts at S2 and terminals at TS2 was all it required. Connecting a DC power supply and beginning at 40V, I slowly adjusted the contact spacing and the forks sprang to life, with a current draw of just 10 mA. With further adjustment, I found that the TTF would start and run as low as 3 V. Amplitude was roughly proportional to excitation voltage. Sitting on the bench, it made a low purring sound with no vibration felt in the base due to careful dynamic balancing of the forks. 

    Connecting MAG-2A and B to an oscilloscope, I observed oscillation at exactly 30 Hz. Considering the mass of the tuning forks, this should be a very stable oscillator, drifting only slowly with ambient temperature changes. Assuming the forks are made of ordinary steel, I estimate that the temperature coefficient of frequency is about -24 ppm/degC.

    What is it For?

    Little information on “telegraph tuning forks” can be located with a web search, but a number of interesting uses are suggested in a patent search. One fundamental application is synchronous telegraphy where the two ends of the connection rely on stable, matched oscillators to encode and decode transmitted data. More importantly, such synchronization allows multiplex telegraphy where several independent data streams may be sent down a single wired connection. In one patent [Ref. 3], a TTF is shown at each end of the link with its auxiliary contacts causing a large rotary switch to advance with each pulse. In effect, the rotary switch dynamically chooses among several sender-receiver pairs in a kind of time-sharing arrangement.

    As time went on, manual sending and receiving of Morse code was sometimes replaced with faster automated transmission consisting of punched tape at the sending end and a variety of receiving devices. Synchronous timing is very important and once again the TTF appears. We would now call it a clock oscillator. By the way, these same mechanisms were also used for teletype data. Long terrestrial lines are problematic due to signal loss and distortion. What was needed is an amplifier of some sort, but that did not exist prior to the invention of the vacuum tube. So an electromechanical repeater was devised. The patent in Ref. 4 relies on synchronous telegraphy where the transmission occurs at a fixed frequency, and uses a TTF as a sampling device to pick out the best part of each signal pulse. The auxiliary contacts then produce a nice, clean output for retransmission.


    This turns out to be an important and useful invention in the telegraph industry. Being a telegrapher myself (radio, to be exact), these devices are fascinating. If anyone has additional information about the TFF, I’d love to hear about it (email gwj@me.com). Additional high-resolution photos are available.

    References

    1. National Museum of American History, “Telegraph tuning fork”, Cat. No. 331340. https://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/object/nmah_890715
    2. Walter A. Houghtaling, “Adjustable-Vibration Tuning Fork”, U.S. Patent No. 1,466,623, 1923.
    3. Poul La Cour, “Synchronous Telegraphy”, U.S. Patent No. 302,502, 1884.
    4. Herbert Angel, “Regenerative Telegraph Repeater”, U.S. Patent No. 1,673,726, 1928.
  • Another Bug Restoration

    by Gary Johnson, NA6O gwj@me.com

    It seems that I spend too much time restoring old keys but somehow it’s more fun than trouble to me. I recently was given a beat-up and not very valuable Les Logan Speed-X model 510 bug.

    This represents the low-end of the market in the 1930s, with a cast zinc base and all-steel components. It’s also too light and almost demands bolting to the table. As received, it was dirty and rusty, missing the damper assembly, the dot spring was broken, and an adjustment screw had its head broken off. Also there was no return spring. I stripped and repainted the base, cleaned everything, and machined the required parts. So this sow’s ear is… Well, still not a silk purse but at least it functions and is non-toxic. If you need any Morse key of any type repaired, let me know.

  • Photos from the 2025 IDXC in Visalia

    Bob Wilson N6TV took a few nice snapshots at the International DX Convention. Visit the album here. Thanks Bob!

    N6TV

  • Santa Maria Convention Announced

    The Southern California Contest Club has announced that the Santa Maria 2026 DX & Contesters Convention is happening April 10-12, 2026 at The Historic Santa Maria Inn. Registration is open for the convention, and a Contest Dinner Friday night. Hotel reservations are also open.

    Santa Maria is a charming town on the central coast, close to wineries and other attractions**.

    For more information and to register, visit the convention website.

    ** Your webmaster suggests making time for a visit to the nearby Carrizo Plain National Monument, where April is the start of the wildflower season, and the San Andreas Fault is visible in all its glory. Dirt road ready vehicles recommended. Also nearby are Hearst Castle and Pismo Beach.

  • A Ham Radio Station for Jenna

    by Gary Johnson, NA6O, and Jim Ewing, N4TMM

    We hams are famous for helping one another in many ways such as education, setting up equipment, or group operating events such as Field Day and emergency communications. Our team recently had a very successful experience helping a young CW op who was in need.

    Twenty year old Jenna Hurley, N4JEH, is a blind student at the E.H. Gentry Facility, a component of the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind (AIDB). Adopted from an orphanage in China along with five siblings by her parents in Alabama, Jenna received excellent home schooling from her father, David. They even learned Braille together. David eventually discovered ham radio and started learning Morse code. That caught Jenna’s ear and together they used online resources to study and obtain their licenses when she was 17.

    Jenna, N4JEH, showing off her new TS-590S and one of her favorite bugs. Photo credit: N4TMM.

    They had a station set up at home, so Jenna was able to get on the air. CW was (and is) her passion and she quickly became highly skilled at it. So skilled and active in fact, that she was soon invited into both CWops and FOC, which is an honor for any telegrapher especially someone so new to the hobby. This led to numerous friendships worldwide.

    After moving into the dorms at E.H. Gentry, Jenna was left without her own station to operate. With some difficulty due to poor blind accessibility, she was able to access some RemoteHams stations, and also did some POTA operating with her boyfriend, Gunner, KK7DEU. But every active ham really needs a proper station with a good radio and antenna. This is when those ham radio friendships really paid off.

    There are many blind hams just like Jenna who may not be able to fully enjoy their hobby for various reasons, often financial. Gary, NA6O, started making friends with blind hams several years ago after realizing this need [Ref 1]. Specific radio models are of value to blind operators because they have a built-in voice guide and relatively easy-to-use controls. This is known as accessibility. The Kenwood TS-590S is perhaps the most accessible and popular. Gary started buying these radios on the second-hand market, outfitting them with the speech module, and then donating them to needy blind hams. One of his beneficiaries, Dave, W4CI (who is also an FOC member), mentioned that Jenna was a good candidate for a radio. That started the ball rolling.

    Gary and Dave started working with Fred, KT5X (FOC of course!), who already knew Jenna, and in turn he recruited Jim, N4TMM, who turned out to be the key player in our success. Jim, who lives in Atlanta, would be in Sylacauga Alabama the first week of April to participate as a stone sculptor in the Alabama Marble Festival. Sylacauga is only a few miles down the road from Talladega, the location of E.H. Gentry and AIDB. So Jim was in perfect position to help set up Jenna’s station. 

    Jim approached the president of AIDB, Dr. Dennis Gilliam, and also Ms. Jessica Edmiston, who offered their full support. Meanwhile, Gary had sent Jim a power supply for the TS-590S that Dave was sending Jim. And Jim ordered a MyAntennas end fed halfwave wire antenna, a proven commercial design that will typically tune acceptably on several bands. 

    On Thursday, April 3rd, Jim met with EH Gentry maintenance people Joe Hutto, Don Llewellyn, and Tony Adams. Tony was there with his truck full of tools, ladders and other maintenance equipment, and Jim brought his radio toolbox and all the equipment for Jenna’s station that he had collected. After surveying the surroundings, Jim and Tony concluded that the best option was to lay the wire antenna, about 140 ft long, on the roof of the three-story dormitory where Jenna lives. So Tony got out his ladder and he and Jim installed the antenna on the roof and connected it to the radio in Jenna’s room. Thankfully they allowed a wall penetration for the coax, something that had been a concern for a long time.

    At that point, Jim got on the phone with Gary, who was listening on his radio in California and also watching the Reverse Beacon network, gave feedback while Jim tuned and transmitted on various bands. The antenna and the station turned out to be excellent performers on 40 through 10 m, tuning fine and getting reports from NA as well as DX. The roof where the antenna is located is the highest point around, and the dorm is on a hill. The antenna lies generally in a Northeast to Southwest direction, and it propagates well in all directions. As a bonus, her noise floor is very low. We should all be so lucky in our modern age of rampant RFI.

    In all of this, Jim was amazed and gratified at the support and assistance from AIDB and E.H. Gentry people in helping their student Jenna get on the air from her dorm and continue her excellent trajectory as a well-known CW operator. Jenna, in turn, takes great joy in operating from E.H. Gentry, thus adding to the fame and furthering the cause of this well known and highly regarded institute for the deaf and blind. 

    Jenna’s first contact with her new station was George, NE5A, who was also her advisor in the CWops CW Academy when she was starting out. A delightful coincidence! Since then, she’s been on the air every day, making contacts worldwide and is now a CWops advisor herself. And she is indeed a first-class operator, including QRQ, something that many hams only dream of achieving. Check out her YouTube channel, QRQ Maniacs [Ref 2.].

    Jenna has a bright future ahead. She’s currently taking classes at Central Alabama Community College, focusing on computer science. She then plans to attend a university to obtain her BSCS degree, and has a particular interest in assistive technologies. Jenna wishes to thank some of her Elmers, particularly CWops advisors NE5A and AJ1DM, and her dad, David KO4WSU. We in the ham radio community are glad to have helped her along in some small way.

    References

    1. Gary Johnson, NA6O, “Summer’s Legacy.” Solid Copy, No… 177, October 2024. https://cwops.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Solid-Copy_2024_October_FINAL.pdf
    2. “QRQ Maniacs” YouTube channel. https://www.youtube.com/@QRQmaniacs

    About the Authors

    Gary Johnson, NA6O, enjoys station building, contesting, and anything to do with CW. A retired engineer, he lives in Livermore, CA.

    Jim Ewing, N4TMM, is a retired patent attorney in Atlanta, GA who primarily enjoys CW on the HF bands using bugs.” 

  • Interesting Websites from IDXC

    Here’s a few websites that I gleaned from DX Academy, Contest Academy, and Saturday presentations at the IDXC last weekend. Did I miss any? Add them in the comments! – Jeff WK6I

    Our own N6TV “TV Bob” presented “Station Automation Techniques & Recommendations” in the Contest Academy.

    Mark K6UFO explained “How to have fun contesting in FT Modes”.

    I’m sure you all are aware of this website, but I was not SolarHam.com, by VE3EN.

    Another thing I didn’t know about? ClubLog live streams. And these DXpedition listings. I need to get with the program…

    John NN6U presented “Contesting while activating POTA” (Parks On The Air). My takeaway is that, if you happen to be in a POTA park (like we often are during CQP for example), you can increase your visibility by operating as a POTA Activator. In particular, register your future activation on the POTA website, and when you go on the air you will get spotted there by POTA Hunters (and skimmers for CW/digital). This is not considered self-spotting. John said this presentation was basically the same as this one he made at the March 2024 NCCC meeting.

    There were also presentations by Chris N6WM on Remote SO2R and 2BSIQ, and Hank W6SX on Having Fun Contesting.

    A couple of websites from Bill K8TE’s “Tools for Propagation Prediction”. Here are some “Free DX Cluster Clients for Windows“. And Martti Laine’s book “Where Do We Go Next?” is available here to read for free.

    During the Contest Forum on Saturday, an attendee pleaded with the panel to explain all the acronyms and terms they were throwing around. Other attendees provided a glossary posted on the Contest University website, and another from the ARRL.

    Also on Saturday, AA7JV gave an interesting presentation on “Better Low Band Reception for DXpeditions“.